↓ Skip to main content

Biomedical Engineering Technologies

Overview of attention for book
Biomedical Engineering Technologies
Springer US
Attention for Chapter: Ex Vivo and In Vitro Methods for Detection of Bioactive Staphylococcal Enterotoxins
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ex Vivo and In Vitro Methods for Detection of Bioactive Staphylococcal Enterotoxins
Book title
Biomedical Engineering Technologies
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, November 2021
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-1803-5_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-161802-8, 978-1-07-161803-5
Authors

Rasooly, Reuven, Do, Paula, Hernlem, Bradley, Reuven Rasooly, Paula Do, Bradley Hernlem

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#10,098
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#417,306
of 510,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#467
of 691 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 691 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.