↓ Skip to main content

Dengue Virus

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Purification of Dengue and Zika Virus Non-structural Protein 5 for Crystallization and Screening of Antivirals.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Purification of Dengue and Zika Virus Non-structural Protein 5 for Crystallization and Screening of Antivirals.
Book title
Dengue Virus
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-1879-0_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-161878-3, 978-1-07-161879-0
Authors

Gharbi-Ayachi, Aicha, El Sahili, Abbas, Lescar, Julien, Sahili, Abbas El

Abstract

Dengue Virus (DENV) and ZIKA Virus (ZIKV) are two important human pathogens that belong to the Flavivirus genus of positive strand RNA viruses. Symptoms of DENV infections range from asymptomatic or mild fever to life-threatening forms, while ZIKV can lead to teratogenic effects such as microcephaly in newborns and neurological disease like the Guillain-Barré syndrome.Non-Structural Protein 5 (NS5) is the largest and most conserved enzyme across flaviviruses and hence constitutes a prime target for developing pan-flavivirus antiviral inhibitors. NS5 results from the gene fusion between a methyltransferase at the N-terminus of the protein and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) at the C-terminal end. The NS5 protein plays key roles in replication and modification of viral RNA and its inhibition by potent antiviral drugs could prevent severe symptoms associated with infections.We have optimized purification and crystallization protocols to obtain active recombinant proteins suitable for structure-based drug discovery for both the full-length NS5 protein and the polymerase domain of NS5 from DENV and ZIKV .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#10,098
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#415,869
of 507,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#398
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.