You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Argumentation and Intuitive Decision Making: Criminal Sentencing and Sentence Indication
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 15 |
| Book title |
AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_15 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-235730-5, 978-3-64-235731-2
|
| Authors |
Andrew Vincent, Vincent, Andrew |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 29% |
| Psychology | 1 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2012.
All research outputs
#18,323,689
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,005
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,431
of 120,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#50
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.