↓ Skip to main content

Chemosensitivity

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Clonogenic cell survival assay.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
666 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clonogenic cell survival assay.
Book title
Chemosensitivity
Published in
Methods in molecular medicine, May 2005
DOI 10.1385/1-59259-869-2:021
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-345-9, 978-1-59259-869-4
Authors

Munshi A, Hobbs M, Meyn RE, Anupama Munshi, Marvette Hobbs, Raymond E. Meyn, Munshi, Anupama, Hobbs, Marvette, Meyn, Raymond E.

Abstract

The clonogenic cell survival assay determines the ability of a cell to proliferate indefinitely, thereby retaining its reproductive ability to form a large colony or a clone. This cell is then said to be clonogenic. A cell survival curve is therefore defined as a relationship between the dose of the agent used to produce an insult and the fraction of cells retaining their ability to reproduce. Although clonogenic cell survival assays were initially described for studying the effects of radiation on cells and have played an essential role in radiobiology, they are now widely used to examine the effects of agents with potential applications in the clinic. These include, in addition to ionizing radiation, chemotherapy agents such as etoposide and cisplatin, antiangiogenic agents such as endostatin and angiostatin, and cytokines and their receptors, either alone or in combination therapy. Survival curves have been generated for many established cell lines growing in culture. One can use cell lines from various origins including humans and rodents; these cells can be neoplastic or normal. Because survival curves have wide application in evaluating the reproductive integrity of different cells, we provide here the steps involved in setting up a typical experiment using an established cell line in culture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 666 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 647 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 174 26%
Student > Master 105 16%
Researcher 88 13%
Student > Bachelor 84 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Other 78 12%
Unknown 95 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 170 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 151 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 93 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 4%
Chemistry 25 4%
Other 72 11%
Unknown 128 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2012.
All research outputs
#15,258,711
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular medicine
#40
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,112
of 57,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them