Pluripotent Stem-Cell Derived Cardiomyocytes
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
CRISPRi/a Screening with Human iPSCs
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Pluripotent Stem-Cell Derived Cardiomyocytes
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-1484-6_23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-161483-9, 978-1-07-161484-6
|
| Authors |
Nishiga, Masataka, Qi, Lei S., Wu, Joseph C., Masataka Nishiga, Lei S. Qi, Joseph C. Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,428,909
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#441
of 13,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,394
of 434,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#3
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.