↓ Skip to main content

High-Throughput RNAi Screening

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: High-Throughput RNAi Screening
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
High-Throughput RNAi Screening
Chapter number 10
Book title
High-Throughput RNAi Screening
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6337-9_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6335-5, 978-1-4939-6337-9
Authors

Iles, LaKesla R, Bartholomeusz, Geoffrey A, LaKesla R. Iles, Geoffrey A. Bartholomeusz Ph.D., Iles, LaKesla R., Bartholomeusz, Geoffrey A., Geoffrey A. Bartholomeusz

Editors

David O. Azorsa, Shilpi Arora

Abstract

The intrinsic limitations of 2D monolayer cell culture models have prompted the development of 3D cell culture model systems for in vitro studies. Multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS) models closely simulate the pathophysiological milieu of solid tumors and are providing new insights into tumor biology as well as differentiation, tissue organization, and homeostasis. They are straightforward to apply in high-throughput screens and there is a great need for the development of reliable and robust 3D spheroid-based assays for high-throughput RNAi screening for target identification and cell signaling studies highlighting their potential in cancer research and treatment. In this chapter we describe a stringent standard operating procedure for the use of MCTS for high-throughput RNAi screens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 50%
Student > Master 3 30%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,468,369
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,923
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,559
of 393,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.