↓ Skip to main content

Predispositions and the comparative effectiveness of rational, emotional and discrepant appeals for both high involvement and low involvement products

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 750)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predispositions and the comparative effectiveness of rational, emotional and discrepant appeals for both high involvement and low involvement products
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02721951
Authors

John H. Holmes, Kenneth E. Crocker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Vietnam 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 26%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 35 49%
Social Sciences 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,101,634
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#42
of 750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101
of 11,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them