↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Elucidation of mammalian bitter taste.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Elucidation of mammalian bitter taste.
Book title
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
Published in
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10254-005-0041-0
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-030384-8, 978-3-54-032431-7
Authors

Meyerhof W, Wolfgang Meyerhof, Meyerhof, Wolfgang

Abstract

A family of approximately 30 TAS2R bitter taste receptors has been identified in mammals. Their genes evolved through adaptive diversification and are linked to chromosomal loci known to influence bitter taste in mice and humans. The agonists for various TAS2Rs have been identified and all of them were established as bitter tastants. TAS2Rs are broadly tuned to detect multiple bitter substances, explaining, in part, how mammals can recognize numerous bitter compounds with a limited set of receptors. The TAS2Rs are expressed in a subset of taste receptor cells, which are distinct from those mediating responses to other taste qualities. However, cells devoted to the detection of sweet, umami, and bitter stimuli share common signal transduction components. Transgenic expression of a human TAS2R in sweet or bitter taste receptor-expressing cells of mice induced either strong attraction or aversion to the receptor's cognate bitter tastant. Thus, dedicated taste receptor cells appear to function as broadly tuned detectors for bitter substances and are wired to elicit aversive behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Chemistry 10 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,256,901
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#64
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,594
of 57,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them