↓ Skip to main content

Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Show Me How to Tie a Tie: Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Video Retrieval
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The CLEF Monolingual Grid of Points
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Test Collection for Research on Depression and Language Use
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Assessors Agreement: A Case Study Across Assessor Type, Payment Levels, Query Variations and Relevance Dimensions
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Reranking Hypotheses of Machine-Translated Queries for Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Two-Way Parsimonious Classification Models for Evolving Hierarchies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Effects of Language and Terminology on the Usage of Health Query Suggestions
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Predicting Contextually Appropriate Venues in Location-Based Social Networks
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 I, Me, Mine: The Role of Personal Phrases in Author Profiling
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Improving Profiles of Weakly-Engaged Users
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Kronecker Decomposition for Image Classification
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Two-Step Retrieval Method for Image Captioning
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Concept Recognition in French Biomedical Text Using Automatic Translation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Product Feature-Based User-Centric Ranking Model for E-Commerce Search
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Random Performance Differences Between Online Recommender System Algorithms
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 SS4MCT: A Statistical Stemmer for Morphologically Complex Texts
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Index-Based Semantic Tagging for Efficient Query Interpretation
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Gamified Approach to Relevance Judgement
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Evaluating Categorisation in Real Life – An Argument Against Simple but Impractical Metrics
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 How Relevant is the Long Tail?
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Towards an Understanding of Transactional Tasks
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Health Suggestions: A Chrome Extension to Help Laypersons Search for Health Information
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Brazilian Social Mood: The Political Dimension of Emotion
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Overview of the CLEF eHealth Evaluation Lab 2016
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 General Overview of ImageCLEF at the CLEF 2016 Labs
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 LifeCLEF 2016: Multimedia Life Species Identification Challenges
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Overview of NewsREEL’16: Multi-dimensional Evaluation of Real-Time Stream-Recommendation Algorithms
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Overview of PAN’16
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Overview of the CLEF 2016 Social Book Search Lab
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Overview of the CLEF 2016 Cultural Micro-blog Contextualization Workshop
Attention for Chapter 3: A Test Collection for Research on Depression and Language Use
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Test Collection for Research on Depression and Language Use
Chapter number 3
Book title
Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44564-9_3
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-944563-2, 978-3-31-944564-9
Authors

David E. Losada, Fabio Crestani

Editors

Norbert Fuhr, Paulo Quaresma, Teresa Gonçalves, Birger Larsen, Krisztian Balog, Craig Macdonald, Linda Cappellato, Nicola Ferro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 40 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 37%
Linguistics 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Philosophy 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 45 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,468,369
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,013
of 8,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,601
of 342,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#343
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.