Lung Inflammation in Health and Disease, Volume II
Springer International Publishing
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Sex and Gender Differences in Lung Disease
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Lung Inflammation in Health and Disease, Volume II
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-68748-9_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-068747-2, 978-3-03-068748-9
|
| Authors |
Patricia Silveyra, Nathalie Fuentes, Daniel Enrique Rodriguez Bauza, Silveyra, Patricia, Fuentes, Nathalie, Rodriguez Bauza, Daniel Enrique, Daniel Rodriguez Bauza |
| Abstract |
Sex differences in the anatomy and physiology of the respiratory system have been widely reported. These intrinsic sex differences have also been shown to modulate the pathophysiology, incidence, morbidity, and mortality of several lung diseases across the life span. In this chapter, we describe the epidemiology of sex differences in respiratory diseases including neonatal lung disease (respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia) and pediatric and adult disease (including asthma, cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, obstructive sleep apnea, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and respiratory viral infections such as respiratory syncytial virus, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2). We also discuss the current state of research on the mechanisms underlying the observed sex differences in lung disease susceptibility and severity and the importance of considering both sex and gender variables in research studies' design and analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,388,065
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#559
of 5,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,534
of 435,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#5
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.