↓ Skip to main content

Teratogenicity Testing

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Teratogenicity Testing'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The ICH S5(R2) Guideline for the Testing of Medicinal Agents
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Nonclinical Reproductive Toxicity Testing Requirements for Drugs, Pesticides, and Industrial Chemicals in India and China
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Developmental Toxicity Testing of Biologics
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals and Pesticides
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Teratology Testing Under REACH
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Teratology Testing of Food Additives
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Developmental Toxicity Testing of Vaccines
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The Teratology Testing of Cosmetics
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Teratology Studies in the Rat
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Teratology Studies in the Mouse
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Combined Fertility and Embryotoxicity Study
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Teratology Studies in the Rabbit
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Teratology Studies in the Minipig
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Embryo fetal Development Studies in Nonhuman Primates
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Enhanced Pre- and Postnatal Development Study for Monoclonal Antibodies
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Skeletal Examination by Alizarin Staining
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Skeletal Examination by Double Staining for Ossified Bone and Cartilaginous Tissue
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Small Animal Imaging and Examination by Micro-CT
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Fetal Soft Tissue Examination by Serial Sectioning
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Fetal Soft Tissue Examinations by Microdissection
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Soft Tissue Examination of the Fetal Rat and Rabbit Head by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Historical Control Data in Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Studies
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Reporting of Teratology Studies
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Maternal toxicity.
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Innovations in Testing Strategies in Reproductive Toxicology
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Predictive models and computational toxicology.
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 The Embryonic Stem Cell Test
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Zebrafish Teratogenicity Testing
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay on Xenopus and Predictivity Compared with In Vivo Mammalian Studies
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 The Rat Whole Embryo Culture Assay Using the Dysmorphology Score System
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Toxicogenomic Approaches in Developmental Toxicology Testing
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Teratogenicity Testing
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 Regulatory Assessment of Reproductive Toxicology Data
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Hazard and Risk Assessment of Teratogenic Chemicals Under REACH
  36. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 35 Reproductive toxicity risk assessment for pesticides.
  37. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 36 The thalidomide disaster, lessons from the past.
Attention for Chapter 36: The thalidomide disaster, lessons from the past.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 14,346)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
63 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The thalidomide disaster, lessons from the past.
Chapter number 36
Book title
Teratogenicity Testing
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-131-8_36
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-130-1, 978-1-62703-131-8
Authors

Ridings JE, James E. Ridings, Ridings, James E.

Abstract

It is close to 60 years since thalidomide was created by the German company, Chemie-Grünenthal, and launched as "Contergan." This was soon to be followed in England by the launch of "Distaval." Of all the drugs developed in the intervening years, thalidomide has undoubtedly had the greatest influence on shaping the Pharmaceutical Industry as we know it today.Strong marketing pressure in an Industry hungry for new medicines brought an inadequately tested drug to the market, targeted outsourcing quickly expanded the client base and finally market forces prevented timely withdrawal, even when evidence was emerging of disastrous side-effects. The full story of thalidomide was told by the Sunday Times in "Suffer The Children" (Kingsley et al., Suffer the children: the story of thalidomide, the insight team of the Sunday times (UK), 1979).Many preventative measures have been taken in the intervening years in light of the lessons learned with thalidomide. However, many of the pressures that led to the thalidomide disaster exist today with record high management and shareholder pressures to achieve success, parallel worldwide marketing, increased numbers of targeted outsourcing by small companies forming alliances with "Big Pharma" and, according to some commentators, a breakdown in the system of checks and balances that have existed in the regulatory authorities in the intervening years.Using thalidomide as a point of reference, this chapter looks at drug development and testing, regulatory authorities and guidelines, outsourcing and in-licensing, pharmacovigilance, and factors that influence withdrawal of a drug from the market.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 180 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 24%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 7 4%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 56 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Chemistry 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 63 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#740,255
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#47
of 14,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,430
of 291,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#3
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.