Bacterial Pangenomics
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Phylogenetic Methods for Genome-Wide Association Studies in Bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Bacterial Pangenomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-1099-2_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-161098-5, 978-1-07-161099-2
|
| Authors |
Didelot, Xavier, Xavier Didelot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 44% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 72% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 28% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,339,228
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#352
of 14,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,144
of 456,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#5
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.