You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Better Identification of Repeats in Metagenomic Scaffolding
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Algorithms in Bioinformatics
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-43681-4_14 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-943680-7, 978-3-31-943681-4
|
| Authors |
Jay Ghurye, Mihai Pop, Ghurye, Jay, Pop, Mihai |
| Editors |
Martin Frith, Christian Nørgaard Storm Pedersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,100,361
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#879
of 8,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,698
of 375,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#39
of 471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.