You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
On the Utility of Redundant Encodings in Mutation-Based Evolutionary Search
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 9 |
Book title |
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN VII
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, October 2002
|
DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45712-7_9 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-044139-7, 978-3-54-045712-1
|
Authors |
Joshua D. Knowles, Richard A. Watson, Knowles, Joshua D., Watson, Richard A. |
Editors |
Juan Julián Merelo Guervós, Panagiotis Adamidis, Hans-Georg Beyer, Hans-Paul Schwefel, José-Luis Fernández-Villacañas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 17% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 42% |
Professor | 3 | 25% |
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 9 | 75% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,754,533
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,494
of 8,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,985
of 47,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.