You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Effect of Curcumin on Severity of Functional Dyspepsia: a Triple Blinded Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-64872-5_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-064871-8, 978-3-03-064872-5
|
| Authors |
Yunes Panahi, Ashraf Karbasi, Ghasem Valizadegan, Nayyereh Ostadzadeh, Sara Saffar Soflaei, Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Muhammed Majeed, Amirhossein Sahebkar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,779,599
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#425
of 4,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,854
of 434,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.