You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guiding Academic Clinician Educators at Research-Intensive Institutions: a Framework for Chairs, Chiefs, and Mentors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-021-06713-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Chang, Brian S. Schwartz, Elizabeth Harleman, Meshell Johnson, Louise C. Walter, Alicia Fernandez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 60% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 56% |
| Scientists | 18 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#837,037
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#675
of 8,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,955
of 435,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#19
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.