↓ Skip to main content

Biolistic DNA Delivery

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Biolistic DNA Delivery'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Comparison Between Agrobacterium -Mediated and Direct Gene Transfer Using the Gene Gun
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Transient Gene Expression in Epidermal Cells of Plant Leaves by Biolistic DNA Delivery
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Transformation of Nuclear DNA in Meristematic and Embryogenic Tissues
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Biolistic DNA Delivery to Leaf Tissue of Plants with the Non-vacuum Gene Gun (HandyGun)
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 HandGun-Mediated Inoculation of Plants with Viral Pathogens for Mechanistic Studies
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Biolistics-Based Gene Silencing in Plants Using a Modified Particle Inflow Gun
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Biolistic Transformation of Caenorhabditis elegans
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Improved Vectors for Selection of Transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Biolistic Transformation of Brugia Malayi
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Biolistic Transfection of Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293 Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Biolistic Transfection of Tumor Tissue Samples
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Biolistic Transfection of Freshly Isolated Adult Ventricular Myocytes
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Biolistic transfection of neurons in organotypic brain slices.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Biolistic DNA Delivery to Mice with the Low Pressure Gene Gun
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Chemokine Overexpression in the Skin by Biolistic DNA Delivery
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Enhancement of Gene Gun-Induced Vaccine-Specific Cytotoxic T-Cell Response by Administration of Chemotherapeutic Drugs
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Dendritic Cell-Specific Biolistic Transfection Using the Fascin Gene Promoter
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Particle-Mediated Administration of Plasmid DNA on Corneas of BALB/c Mice
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Optimizing particle-mediated epidermal delivery of an influenza DNA vaccine in ferrets.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Methods for Monitoring Gene Gun-Induced HBV- and HCV-Specific Immune Responses in Mouse Models
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Gene gun immunization to combat malaria.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Identification of T Cell Epitopes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Biolistic DNA Vaccination
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Biolistic DNA vaccination against trypanosoma infection.
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Biolistic DNA Vaccination Against Melanoma
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Biolistic DNA Vaccination Against Cervical Cancer
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Efficiency of Biolistic DNA Vaccination in Experimental Type I Allergy
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Safety Assessment of Biolistic DNA Vaccination
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 DiOlistics: Delivery of Fluorescent Dyes into Cells
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Protein Antigen Delivery by Gene Gun-Mediated Epidermal Antigen Incorporation (EAI)
Attention for Chapter 19: Optimizing particle-mediated epidermal delivery of an influenza DNA vaccine in ferrets.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Optimizing particle-mediated epidermal delivery of an influenza DNA vaccine in ferrets.
Chapter number 19
Book title
Biolistic DNA Delivery
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-110-3_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-109-7, 978-1-62703-110-3
Authors

Eric J. Yager, Cristy Stagnar, Ragisha Gopalakrishnan, James T. Fuller, Deborah H. Fuller, Yager, Eric J., Stagnar, Cristy, Gopalakrishnan, Ragisha, Fuller, James T., Fuller, Deborah H.

Abstract

Particle-mediated DNA delivery technologies ("gene guns") have been shown in both animal and clinical studies to be an effective means of increasing the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of DNA vaccines. The primary goal in optimizing particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) vaccination in different animal models is to achieve delivery of DNA-coated gold beads into the viable epidermis. Two key para-meters that influence this outcome include the delivery pressure, which controls the penetrative force of the beads into the skin, and the anatomical site of DNA delivery. Although the ferret has been extensively used as an experimental model for influenza infection in humans, very few studies have investigated the capacity for PMED DNA vaccination to induce protective immune responses in ferrets. Here we describe methods to optimize DNA vaccine delivery using the PowderJect XR1 gene delivery in ferrets. We first assess the effects of firing pressure on both the delivery of DNA-coated gold beads into the desired epidermal layer and the degree of DNA vaccine reporter gene expression at the target site. Second, we evaluate the impact of vaccination site (skin or tongue) on DNA vaccine immunogenicity by measuring serum antibody responses to the model antigens influenza virus hemagglutinin and hepatitis B core antigen. Results from these studies support the use of the PowderJect XR1 device in ferrets for the study of prophylactic and therapeutic DNA vaccines against clinically important diseases such as influenza virus infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,737,203
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,651
of 13,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,199
of 280,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#166
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.