↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Eccentric Contraction-Induced Muscle Injury: Reproducible, Quantitative, Physiological Models to Impair Skeletal Muscle's Capacity to Generate Force.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Volumetric Muscle Loss.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Noninvasive Tracking of Quiescent and Activated Muscle Stem Cell (MuSC) Engraftment Dynamics In Vivo.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 FACS Fractionation and Differentiation of Skeletal-Muscle Resident Multipotent Tie2+ Progenitors.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 In Vivo Assessment of Muscle Contractility in Animal Studies.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Assessment of the Contractile Properties of Permeabilized Skeletal Muscle Fibers.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Analysis of Aerobic Respiration in Intact Skeletal Muscle Tissue by Microplate-Based Respirometry.
Attention for Chapter 2: Volumetric Muscle Loss.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Volumetric Muscle Loss.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3810-0_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3808-7, 978-1-4939-3810-0
Authors

Beth E. Pollot, Benjamin T. Corona Ph.D., Benjamin T. Corona, Pollot, Beth E., Corona, Benjamin T.

Editors

Michael Kyba

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury is prevalent in severe extremity trauma and is an emerging focus area among orthopedic and regenerative medicine fields. VML injuries are the result of an abrupt, frank loss of tissue and therefore of different etiology from other standard rodent injury models to include eccentric contraction, ischemia reperfusion, crush, and freeze injury. The current focus of many VML-related research efforts is to regenerate the lost muscle tissue and thereby improve muscle strength. Herein, we describe a VML model in the anterior compartment of the hindlimb that is permissible to repeated neuromuscular strength assessments and is validated in mouse, rat, and pig.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 65 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 42 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 10%
Materials Science 9 4%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 76 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,995,112
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#309
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,684
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#45
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.