↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Eccentric Contraction-Induced Muscle Injury: Reproducible, Quantitative, Physiological Models to Impair Skeletal Muscle's Capacity to Generate Force.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Volumetric Muscle Loss.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Noninvasive Tracking of Quiescent and Activated Muscle Stem Cell (MuSC) Engraftment Dynamics In Vivo.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 FACS Fractionation and Differentiation of Skeletal-Muscle Resident Multipotent Tie2+ Progenitors.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 In Vivo Assessment of Muscle Contractility in Animal Studies.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Assessment of the Contractile Properties of Permeabilized Skeletal Muscle Fibers.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Analysis of Aerobic Respiration in Intact Skeletal Muscle Tissue by Microplate-Based Respirometry.
Attention for Chapter 19: Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
Chapter number 19
Book title
Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3810-0_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3808-7, 978-1-4939-3810-0
Authors

Sperringer, Justin E, Grange, Robert W, Justin E. Sperringer, Robert W. Grange

Editors

Michael Kyba

Abstract

In vitro muscle contractile function assays are important to characterize the differences between different muscle types (e.g., slow vs. fast), between a diseased and non-diseased muscle, or importantly, to demonstrate the efficacy of a muscle treatment such as a drug, an overexpressed transgene, or knockout of a specific gene. Fundamental contractile properties can be assessed by twitch, tetanic, force-frequency, force-velocity, and fatigue assays. Many of these assays are conducted with the muscle at a constant length, e.g., an isometric contraction. However, to better represent the dynamic purpose of muscles in vivo (e.g., to move limbs), dynamic assays such as the force-velocity (concentric contractions) or stretch-injury (eccentric contractions) should also be obtained. Characterizing skeletal muscle function in vitro is a powerful approach to demonstrate efficacy of a treatment to rescue diseased muscle and to assess functional regeneration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Sports and Recreations 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,268,952
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,196
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,088
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#417
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.