↓ Skip to main content

Astrostatistical Challenges for the New Astronomy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: BEAMS: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff in Supernova Analysis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
BEAMS: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff in Supernova Analysis
Chapter number 4
Book title
Astrostatistical Challenges for the New Astronomy
Published in
arXiv, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3508-2_4
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-3507-5, 978-1-4614-3508-2
Authors

Martin Kunz, Renée Hlozek, Bruce A. Bassett, Mathew Smith, James Newling, Melvin Varughese, Kunz, Martin, Hlozek, Renée, Bassett, Bruce A., Smith, Mathew, Newling, James, Varughese, Melvin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 33%
Design 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,737,203
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#319,007
of 929,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,199
of 280,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#1,259
of 5,070 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929,257 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,070 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.