You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Planarizing Gadgets for Perfect Matching Do Not Exist
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 43 |
Book title |
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2012
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-32589-2_43 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-232588-5, 978-3-64-232589-2
|
Authors |
Rohit Gurjar, Arpita Korwar, Jochen Messner, Simon Straub, Thomas Thierauf |
Editors |
Branislav Rovan, Vladimiro Sassone, Peter Widmayer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 33% |
Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 50% |
Mathematics | 1 | 17% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,709,996
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,869
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,015
of 244,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#113
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.