↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic Resistance

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: The Origins of Antibiotic Resistance
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Origins of Antibiotic Resistance
Chapter number 2
Book title
Antibiotic Resistance
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-28951-4_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-228950-7, 978-3-64-228951-4
Authors

Gerard D. Wright, Wright, Gerard D.

Abstract

Antibiotics remain one of our most important pharmacological tools for the control of infectious disease. However, unlike most other drugs, the use of antibiotics selects for resistant organisms and erodes their clinical utility. Resistance can emerge within populations of bacteria by mutation and be retained by subsequent selection or by the acquisition of resistance elements laterally from other organisms. The source of these resistance genes is only now being understood. The evidence supports a large bacterial resistome-the collection of all resistance genes and their precursors in both pathogenic and nonpathogenic bacteria. These genes have arisen by various means including self-protection in the case of antibiotic producers, transport of small molecules for various reasons including nutrition and detoxification of noxious chemicals, and to accomplish other goals, such as metabolism, and demonstrate serendipitous selectivity for antibiotics. Regardless of their origins, resistance genes can rapidly move through bacterial populations and emerge in pathogenic bacteria. Understanding the processes that contribute to the evolution and selection of resistance is essential to mange current stocks of antibiotics and develop new ones.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,515,481
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#399
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,817
of 245,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.