You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Three Approaches to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada: Lessons for Democratic Policy
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Big Picture Bioethics: Developing Democratic Policy in Contested Domains
|
| Published in |
The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-32240-7_11 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-932239-1, 978-3-31-932240-7
|
| Authors |
Rachel A. Ankeny, Fiona J. Mackenzie, Ankeny, Rachel A., Mackenzie, Fiona J. |
| Editors |
Susan Dodds, Rachel A. Ankeny |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2016.
All research outputs
#23,324,704
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,839
of 382,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them