↓ Skip to main content

Designing international organizations for debate? A factor analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Politics, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Designing international organizations for debate? A factor analysis
Published in
International Politics, February 2021
DOI 10.1057/s41311-021-00284-6
Authors

Diana Panke, Franziska Hohlstein, Gurur Polat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,670,023
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from International Politics
#322
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,109
of 418,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Politics
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.