↓ Skip to main content

Using species distribution models to gauge the completeness of the bat checklist of Eswatini

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Wildlife Research, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using species distribution models to gauge the completeness of the bat checklist of Eswatini
Published in
European Journal of Wildlife Research, February 2021
DOI 10.1007/s10344-021-01463-9
Authors

Ara Monadjem, Felicity Simelane, Julie Teresa Shapiro, Bonginkosi C. Gumbi, Mnqobi L. Mamba, Muzi D. Sibiya, Sifiso M. Lukhele, Themb’alilahlwa A.M. Mahlaba

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Professor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,541,199
of 17,608,563 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#173
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,698
of 331,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,608,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.